Choosing People or Profits?
In Alameda County California, a private infirmary turned away a woman in proletariat because the hospitals computer showed that she didnt have insurance. Hours later, her sis was born dead in a county hospital, because the woman was sent to a county hospital and it was as well late to save the unborn child.
In San Bernardino California, a trauma sawbones sent a patient who had been stabbed in the heart to a county medical examination center after examining him and declaring his condition stable. The patient arrived at the county medical center dying; he suffered a cardiac arrest, and died. These two hospitals shifted these patients to county facilities not for medical reasons, but for economic ones -- the receiving hospitals feared they wouldnt be paid for treating the patient. Whats right? Choosing people or profit?
Should at that place be death or tragedy at the closure of poverty and high health care costs, or should a business such as a hospital endure millions everyday to give health care to those who cant return it? An ordinary person like me would feel for the person who could not afford sufficient health insurance, and as in the case above, the pander inside that mothers womb didnt choose its financial situation, or its parents. That baby didnt ask to be born, and it wasnt given a chance to live.
It wasnt need salutaryy the doctors fault, and it wasnt even his or her decision, because of business. Business has moved to the heart of health care, a place once relatively cushioned from the pursuance of profit that drives the rest of the U.S. economy. Throughout the history of the United States, medical institutions have largely been non-profit establishments existing primarily to serve the community. hardly during the past 20 years, the number...
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment