Dilemmas Of Government

The nature of politics is the constancy of conflicts and quandarys that results from the differences in political interests of interacting groups and individuals . In my perspective , if the choice is to be made between emancipation vs (or the original dilemma ) and freedom vs equality (or the modern dilemma , I would choose the latter (modern dilemma ) as the more(prenominal) apparent and considerable problem of politics , as it is a more encompassing and theoretical argument that may be quixotic to solve . In the philosophical sense , it quarter be argued that br freedom-equality balance is impossibility , as the granting of freedom ultimately results in inequality , as freedom is of necessity limited to choice and opportunity , exclusively never outcomes . The design of equality , bet it social , political or stinting , is not achievable with freedom , as equality of outcomes would claim regulation and intervention from the government , which opposes the freedom principle . In the United States freedom vs . equality dilemma is always at work , and can be manifest in , for sheath , the welfare system . This mechanism for economic equality would tint on the freedom of opposites to have more economic security deposit in the budget , or to divert the funds to other important programs . My argument for free vs . equality does not implicate that freedom vs . is non-existent or unimportant , because it is also something that is very observable and immediate , given the dilemma of the government to impose set policies regarding the terrorism scare , in the learn of human security . As per the unnamed dilemma , I believe that a clear one , which is in fact related to but distinct from the original dilemma of freedom vs , is security vs . rights . The judgment of security is more specific than the general idea of , rights is a concept related but varied from freedom .

Issues equivalent wire-tapping and surveillance are hot s that are world supported by some politicians and government agencies who argues for it in the name of security , but such activities would clearly violates individual rights to loneliness Apart from security vs , another unnamed dilemma would be the ideological debate of liberalism vs . socialism , where the editioner promotes individualism , piece of music the latter gives premium to societal welfareIn terms of the majoritarian-pluralist debate , I would be inclined to argue that pluralism is more democratic , as democracy is essentially the recognition of numerous veto groups in spite of appearance the society who has their own interests . A majoritarian model may smoothen the `bulk pulse , but remember that Aristotle said that majority could in fact be tyranny , if unchecked and callow . The pluralist model is more congruent to the democratic principle that recognizes that peck are varying in political interests and knowledge , and should be allowed to articulate similarly varied interests . A majoritarian model is I believe a less flexible democratic form because it establishes hard rules and decisions that majorities would agree on , but it fails to account for the interests of the groups inwardly that majority or minority . The pluralist model...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .