The Gastric Bypass Surgery Postoperative Outcomes

The concept is defined as the difference in outcomes between the dickens procedures, and is defined conceptually as the o'erall benefit of one procedure over the other, and operationally as the actual outcomes observed in monetary value of medical complications, length of hospital stay, etc. The concepts are the inconsistents in this study; the constant is that all the endurings were morbidly obese. The independent variable is morbid obesity; the dependent variables are the two types of surgery.

D. The a priori framework for the study is that laparoscopic surgery, because it is less invasive, and usually involves a more than shorter hospital stay and much shorter recovery time, will give away a better early postoperative result than string out surgery. on that point is only one concept involved so there is no need to link concepts. thither is no theoretical framework involved in this study. It is not interrogatory any theoretical concept. It is looking at practical outcomes from two differing procedures for treating the like problem. It is a comparative study of established techniques. There is no framework to relate the study to. It is a naive observational study, not a theoretical one.

E. The literature go over is virtually non-existent. It only cites two randomized studies of the problem, and gives absolutely no details whatsoever about these studies: it just says

M. The findings of the study were that hospital length of stay was 0.7 years less for those patients who had laparoscopic stomachic short surgery compared to those who had open stomachal bypass surgery. There was a trend to more major complications for patients having laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery, but it was not significantly dissimilar to that for patients having open gastric bypass surgery. Weight loss spare-time activity surgery was significantly better at three, six and 9 months in the laparoscopic group, but there was no difference at 12 months, with the laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery group losing 69 percent of their superabundance body weight and the open gastric bypass surgery group losing 65 percent of their excess body weight. The change in BMI at 12 months was 29.

61 for the laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery group and 31.3 for the open gastric bypass surgery group.

K. The validity of the data is the fact that it is taken from patient records or patient measurements. The only way it would not be valid was if the patients' records were faked in some way, or that patients' records were not unbroken accurately. Since the study was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, there is no modestness to retrieve the patients' records were not accurate. There is no reason to believe the information from patient questionnaires, and the patient measurements recorded were inaccurate for the same reason. The reliability for the post-operative effects of the two different types of surgery is the credibility of the patients, and the accuracy of patients' records. The reliability of the questionnaires is their validity as a test instrument which has been proven previously, and the fact that the values of the scores on these questionnaires for patients were in line with the values obtained on these questionnaires for the normal U.S. population.

L. There were no descriptive tests used to describe the major variables. The major variables were length of hospital
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.